<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.hutchinsonleader.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Hutchinson Leader - LETTER: Early detection is always best cure for breast cancer - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.hutchinsonleader.com/letter-early-detection-always-best-cure-breast-cancer-112</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;LETTER: Early detection is always best cure for breast cancer&quot;</description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>First, please know that I&#039;m</title>
 <link>http://www.hutchinsonleader.com/letter-early-detection-always-best-cure-breast-cancer-112#comment-8657</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;First, please know that I&#039;m not defending the committee.  What they said and how they said it was idiotic and thoughtless.  Things I&#039;ve read since then have elaborated on the thought process.  The committee admitted that the statement should have read that mammograms are more beneficial to women over 50, not that mammograms aren&#039;t necessary starting at age 40.  Why they published that and expected no public uproar is beyond me.  There&#039;s no regulation involved - just recommendations, which will likely be ignored by consumers and doctors, as well as insurance companies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not going to touch your comments on health care reform - that&#039;s what you keep coming back to, and I fully admit that I&#039;m not well enough informed on that topic yet to make a valid argument.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have a great weekend!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:25:27 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mewm172</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8657 at http://www.hutchinsonleader.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cost-benefit analysis, huh?</title>
 <link>http://www.hutchinsonleader.com/letter-early-detection-always-best-cure-breast-cancer-112#comment-8653</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cost-benefit analysis, huh?  How about health-benefit analysis instead?  When we all know that mammograms beginning at age 40 have saved many lives, why did this committee even CONSIDER changing the guidelines for mammograms?!  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My health care should be between me and my doctor, not between me, the government, and then maybe my doctor.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t believe a big government-run health care plan will improve our health care and if you&#039;re concerned about cost-analysis, how is a struggling economy going to pay for it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:41:59 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>star-ann</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8653 at http://www.hutchinsonleader.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It&#039;s highly unlikely that</title>
 <link>http://www.hutchinsonleader.com/letter-early-detection-always-best-cure-breast-cancer-112#comment-8647</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s highly unlikely that anything will actually change in practice.  This was a recommendation, not a &quot;regulation&quot; and there are many critics opposing it.  Insurance companies know that it costs a lot more to treat breast cancer than it costs to provide mammograms between the ages of 40 and 50.  In fact, if you google &quot;mammogram&quot; you&#039;ll find several reports about legislation being proposed to NOT accept these recommendations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 08:13:49 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mewm172</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8647 at http://www.hutchinsonleader.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>There was no new regulation</title>
 <link>http://www.hutchinsonleader.com/letter-early-detection-always-best-cure-breast-cancer-112#comment-8646</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;There was no new regulation on mammograms, just the release of a report by medical researchers recommending that the guidelines be revised.  We need to constantly review medical procedures and run cost-benefit analysis to see what&#039;s working well and what can be improved.  Our current patchwork system of employer sponsored  health insurance subjects us all to &quot;rationing&quot; at the hands of corporate bureaucrats whose only concern is the bottom line of their corporate entity.  I would rather be &quot;rationed&quot; by a medical researcher who is striving to provide the best possible care to all Americans in a government-run health plan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 05:54:17 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>darwinball</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8646 at http://www.hutchinsonleader.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How&#039;s that &quot;hopey-changey&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.hutchinsonleader.com/letter-early-detection-always-best-cure-breast-cancer-112#comment-8645</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;How&#039;s that &quot;hopey-changey&quot; thing working for ya?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:01:27 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tms</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8645 at http://www.hutchinsonleader.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I believe the new regulation</title>
 <link>http://www.hutchinsonleader.com/letter-early-detection-always-best-cure-breast-cancer-112#comment-8638</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;I believe the new regulation of mamograms is only the beginning of the government-run health care program. Decisions about our own health care will be made by federal bureaucrats and most of them will not be health care professionals.  Our privacy will be gone because all of our health and financial records will be available to them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It will ration health care,  provide free health care for illegal immigrants and allow for free abortion services. I don&#039;t want to be responsible for paying for abortions! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Bill will eventually force private insurance companies out of business and put everyone into a government-run system. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This legislation has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. It&#039;s trying to transfer (our) power and rights to the executive branch of government and will destroy the Constitution as we know it.  Currenly we can make our own health care decisions, but if this bill goes through our rights and privacy will be gone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:50:48 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>star-ann</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8638 at http://www.hutchinsonleader.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>LETTER: Early detection is always best cure for breast cancer</title>
 <link>http://www.hutchinsonleader.com/letter-early-detection-always-best-cure-breast-cancer-112</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;From Renee Wetterling&lt;br /&gt;
Hutchinson&lt;br /&gt;
I was both surprised and shocked to read about the new recommendations for breast cancer screening published by a government task force of doctors and scientists.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hutchinsonleader.com/letter-early-detection-always-best-cure-breast-cancer-112&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.hutchinsonleader.com/letter-early-detection-always-best-cure-breast-cancer-112#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.hutchinsonleader.com/news/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:30:00 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">17123 at http://www.hutchinsonleader.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
