News, sports, politics, blogs and forums for Hutchinson, Minnnesota • (320) 587-5000

MotorbuysReal EstatemyMarketplace.mnCoupons

Advertising

Advertising

Partners pull plug on planned Big Stone II power plant


» Read similar stories filed under:

Monday’s announcement that the long-planned 500- to 600-megawatt Big Stone II power plant near Big Stone, S.D., will not be built should not leave Hutchinson residents without electricity.

City-owned Hutchinson Utilities Commission had a contract with Missouri River Energy Services, one of the proposed projects’ four remaining partners, to get 42 megawatts of baseload power from the $1.6 billion plant.

“The contract was continent upon Big Stone II being constructed,” HUC General Manager Mike Kumm said Tuesday.

Hutchinson Utilities is still a market participant in Midwest Independent System Operators, or MISO, and is able generate more than 100 megawatts of power itself or purchase from outside sources depending on the price.

Big Stone II had all its necessary permits to build next to an existing 450-megawatt, coal-fired plant just west of Big Stone. The region's burgeoning wind energy development could be hindered by the loss of the project's high voltage transmission facilities.

Advertisement. Article continues below.

Environmentalists, however, fought the project at each permitting step, saying the potential environmental costs made it a bad choice. They said developers didn’t take into account recent and proposed climate laws and costs associated with them.

Read the entire story in the Leader’s Nov. 5 print edition.

(Terry Davis is a Hutchinson Leader staff writer. E-mail him at davis@hutchinsonleader.com.)




Well what a good time to...

Back to page top

Well what a good time to raise our bills then. They always find a reason....


Submitted by Chacha on November 3, 2009 - 3:17pm.

Who said President Obama is...

Back to page top

Who said President Obama is not keeping his campaign promises??????

http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2008/11/obama_promises_1.html


Submitted by Raymond Norton on November 3, 2009 - 10:03pm.

Oh come on now Ray, let's be...

Back to page top

Oh come on now Ray, let's be fair. President Obama promised to get us out of the war and look how...oh never mind. He did come up with the cash for clunkers and that...oh never mind. The most common trade of all those sales were people who went from a Ford F-150 to another Ford F-150 with almost identical fuel economy. Some trades had people getting vehicles with worse fuel economy and the estimate is that it cost the taxpayer an average of $24,000 per vehicle taken in. He promised to act swiftly on...oh never mind. Hey, but he did win the Nobel Peace Prize for...um...um...let me see...it will come to me...Well, at least he gives a great speech and doesn't trip over his words. And his wife planted a nice garden on the White House grounds. They did get a family dog for the White House like he promised! All that is worth something!


Submitted by just1opinion on November 4, 2009 - 10:09pm.

hey just I agree. all obama...

Back to page top

hey just I agree. all obama has managed to do is recieved an award he does not deserve and let being on tv go to his head. I have never seen a president on tv so much in my entire life. not even bush was on this much. Obama loves the lime light. he reminds me of our poor excuse of a goevnore jessie call me a bully venturia. neither knew how to do their jobs.


Submitted by justlisahere on November 5, 2009 - 3:59pm.

YEAH - Bring Bush back , and...

Back to page top

YEAH - Bring Bush back , and Paulson, so they can "create" the BAILOUT program on Goldman Sacs mgmt ideology!


Submitted by mj on November 4, 2009 - 9:24pm.

It is a crying shame that we...

Back to page top

It is a crying shame that we are unable to build energy. Coal is VERY abundant in the US. The technology to clean the emissions from a coal power plant is mature. All I see is wind wind wind. You cannot build enough wind farms to power America.

But (I guess) you can charge each household more money by trying. My vote is to use proven reliable technology that produces very cheap energy.


Submitted by farrowz on November 5, 2009 - 9:41am.

I am willing to pay more for...

Back to page top

I am willing to pay more for wind energy or other clean energy. We don't need coal power plants putting more CO2 in our atmosphere.


Submitted by alben on November 5, 2009 - 1:34pm.

Do you like your lights to...

Back to page top

Do you like your lights to come on every time you flip up the switch? I would bet you do, otherwise you wouldn't be able post drivel on these blogs without electricity for your computer.

Keep dreaming if you think wind energy is going to save us. Ever do any research on how much CO2 is emitted from ethanol plants? Probably not...

I have nothing against wind power, but to assume that it's a replacement for coal (or nuclear or hydro) energy is just plain idiotic and apparent that there is a lack of understanding of how the electric system works. After reading some of the previous comments it's apparent that people have become much too comfortable with the idea that the lights will come on every time they flip the switch and express excitement when future sources of cheap, dependendable electricity are derailed, but in all reality they are only shooting themselves in the foot.

I really hope the utilities here and across the country raise their rates just so people like you will wake up and learn the hard way what is going on, and voters will recognize what the regime currently holding power at the state and federal level is doing. Then maybe, just maybe, the voters, after noticing their increasing utility bills, won't be so eager to pull the polling booth lever for those who have a (D) behind their name......those candidates responsible for expensive, unreliable energy.

Don't forget that not only is YOUR utility bill increasing due to the fact that you don't support cheap, clean, dependable energy that Big Stone II would have provided, but the utility bill of the the local and regional business owner's where you spend your paycheck on a daily basis is increasing as well. If you think they are going to eat the extra cost of unreliable renewable energy you are misguided.

I truly believe the only way people are going to get this climate change garbage out of their heads is when it hits their pocketbooks in the form of higher rates. Hopefully they'll come out of this moronic trance they've been in before then, because higher utility bills are sure to come if they don't.


Submitted by joedonuts on November 8, 2009 - 12:59am.

So, how much money has...

Back to page top

So, how much money has Hutchinson thrown into this venture that they will not get back??? More of our tax $$$ wasted by the city!!


Submitted by tms on November 10, 2009 - 11:39am.

Actually, the loss is all...

Back to page top

Actually, the loss is all Hutch Utilities'. They transfer over a million dollars a year to the City.


Submitted by Raymond Norton on November 10, 2009 - 1:01pm.

I don't believe there was a...

Back to page top

I don't believe there was a lot of money, if any, put forward by Hutchinson Utilities on Big Stone. Utilities had a contract to get 42 megawatts of baseload power from Missouri River Energy, one of the partners in the project. As the story said, the contract was contingent upon the plant being built, which was a number of years off even if it had gone forward.

It is likely the only expenditure was staff time studying the proposal and attorney fees preparing the contracts.

HUC can generate its more than enough of its own power with its local plants, but natural gas is often much more expensive than electricity generated at a coal-fired plant. One issue with wind power is that it doesn't usually provide a very reliable baseload of power. When is electricity most often needed? On hot summer days when everyone is running their air conditioning and the wind is often not blowing very strongly. So the wind power would fall short of demand. On those days, HUC can use its expensive gas-fired generators at that point and sell into the market because demand is so high.

(Terry Davis is a Hutchinson Leader staff writer. E-mail him at davis@hutchinsonleader.com.)


Submitted by Terry Davis on November 10, 2009 - 2:24pm.

Speaking of Hutch...

Back to page top

Speaking of Hutch Utilities....I would really like someone to answer how they come up with these surcharges...My Gas Meter Charge is $31.50 per month and my Electric Meter is $10 per month...That equals $498 dollars per year...How do you jusify that ? Are these meters really that expensive ? Did some consultant tell you to tack on these fees and hopefully nobody will ever notice. ?I thought my utility bill was high enough without them.


Submitted by Franky on November 10, 2009 - 6:00pm.

Advertising

Advertising

Recent comments

Advertising

Advertising

Who's new

  • Moffitt
  • LeonnaL
  • TiffannieD
  • drivesafely
  • grandma

Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 295 guests online.

Online users

  • Matt McMillan

Today's Poll


» Read similar stories filed under:


Advertising